- 346 wong tiwas ing taun 2019 ing rong kacilakan Boeing 737 MAX mabur ing Ethiopian Airlines ing Ethiopia lan sadurunge ing pesawat Lyon Air ing Indonesia. Sidhang pidana nglawan Boeing dirampungake ing awal taun iki kanthi persetujuan penuntutan sing ditundha, lan saiki nuduhake sebabe.
- Boeing minangka perusahaan manufaktur pesawat berbasis Seattle kanthi kantor pusat perusahaan ing Chicago, Illinois. Napa keluhan pidana tumrap Boeing diadili ing Ft. Worth, Texas?
- Perusahaan hukum pertahanan Boeing Kirkland & Ellis menehi kesepakatan sing nyenengake karo Jaksa AS sing paling misuwur Erin Nealy Cox. Pirang-pirang wulan sawise iki Erin Nealy Cox metu saka tugas pamrentahane sing terkenal lan gabung karo Kirkland & Ellis sing curiga karo proksi sing dimasak.
Kasus pidana Boeing dimaksudake kanggo menehi keadilan kanggo 346 kulawarga sing tiwas ing kacilakan Airlines Ethiopian Airlines lan Lion Air. Asil sidhang Texas iki yaiku ora ana eksekutif senior Boeing sing didakwa.
Tanggal 7 Januari taun iki eTurboNews nerbitake artikel dening Paul Hudson, kepala klompok hak konsumen maskapai Hak Flyers. Dheweke nulis: Boeing dikenani konspirasi penipuan 737 Max, kanggo mbayar denda $ 2.5 milyar.
Laporan sing diterbitake dina iki ing Reporter Kejahatan Perusahaan ngumumake rincian babagan pengaturan iki sing nuduhake manawa pengacara utama sing nuntut kasus kanggo Departemen Kehakiman AS, mantan Pengacara AS Erin Nealy Cox gabung karo firma hukum sing padha Boeing sing nyewa kanggo mbela kasus sing dhuwur sing dituntut.
Nindakake kasus marang Boeing ing Ft. Worth, Texas kaget wiwit wiwitan amarga Texas ora ana hubungane karo perkara kasebut.
Miturut laporan kasebut, kasus kasebut dirampungake karo perjanjian penuntutan sing ditundha. Iki minangka kesepakatan sing diarani Profesor Hukum Columbia, John Coffee, nalika semana - "salah sawijining perjanjian penuntutan penundaan paling parah sing dakdeleng."
The Crime Reporter nerbitake wangsulan saka Michael Stumo lan Nadia Milleon, sing kelangan putriné sing umur 24 taun amarga kacilakan ing Airline Ethiopian.
"Kita nesu banget amarga jaksa penuntut Departemen Kehakiman ngilangi kesepakatan kekasih karo Boeing sing ngidini (mantan CEO Boeing) Dennis Muilenberg lan eksekutif Boeing lan anggota dewan ora ngerti amarga kelalaian lan penipuan pidana sing nyebabake matine Samya nalika padha sugih awake dhewe, "ujare Stumo lan Milleron sajrone menehi komentar nalika nanggepi kabar kasebut. "Kita bingung kenapa Distrik Utara Texas dipilih dening Departemen Kehakiman amarga ora ana tindak pidana sing ana gandhengane karo kabupaten kasebut. Apa hakim sing tundhuk sing disenengi Boeing? Apa jaksa penuntut sing ngerti tim pertahanan kriminal Boeing? Iki informasi anyar sing gawe kaget. ”
Paul Hudson saka klompok konsumen Hak Flyers ngandika eTurboNews kasus kasebut "minangka conto lawang sing ana ing ngendi ribuan karyawan mantan pamrentahan kerja kanggo partai sing diatur minangka pejabat pamrentah. Nanging lawang sing muter ora mestine sabuk pengangkut. ”
Hudson nyimpulake: "Yen jaksa penuntut federal gabung karo partai terdakwa pidana utawa perusahaan pertahanane sakcepete sawise makili pamrentah AS ing perkara pidana sing gegandhengan, iki bakal nyebabake masalah penampilan lan masalah etika,"
APA sing kudu dijupuk saka ARTIKEL INI:
- “We were outraged that the Department of Justice prosecutors cut a sweetheart deal with Boeing which let (former Boeing CEO) Dennis Muilenberg and the Boeing executives and board members off the hook for their criminal negligence and fraud which caused the death of Samya while they enriched themselves,” Stumo and Milleron said in a statement in response to the news.
- A report published today in the Corporate Crime Reporter revealed the details of this arrangement pointing out that the lead attorney prosecuting the case for the US Justice Department, former US Attorney Erin Nealy Cox joined the same law firm Boeing had hired to defend against the high profile case she prosecuted.
- “If a chief federal prosecutor joins a criminal defendant party or its defense firm shortly after representing the US government in a related criminal matter, it raises both appearance concerns and ethical issues,” .
